.com This sequel to Betrayal at Krondor offers many elements of the original game while taking advantage of technological advances. Players trek to investigate the disappearance of the Ishapian church's most sacred relic, the Tear of the Gods. Review After an incredible series of twists and turns during development, the official sequel to one of the most popular role-playing games ever, 1993's Betrayal at Krondor, has finally arrived. Unlike last year's Betrayal in Antara, which was very similar in style, if not in quality, to Betrayal at Krondor, the official sequel is a very different game from its predecessor. Return to Krondor, like Betrayal at Krondor, is set in author Raymond E. Feist's swords-and-sorcery world of Midkemia. Both games provide strongly story-driven experiences, as evidenced by the fact that they are divided into "chapters," during which the plot is advanced in a very linear, predetermined fashion. Similarly, both games require you to use preset characters, each possessing a fully developed, distinctive personality, and determine party membership solely in response to plot developments over which you have no control. But while Betrayal at Krondor allowed you to develop your character in a variety of ways while exploring a vast gaming world and undertaking numerous subquests, Return to Krondor offers much more restrictive gameplay. Each chapter in Return to Krondor is set in a very discrete, confining geographic area (one room, in the case of two of the chapters), and most chapters have no subquests at all, forcing you to focus solely on your primary quest objectives. The handful of available subquests are all interesting and do an excellent job at drawing you deeper into Krondor's world, and the main storyline is consistently compelling. In fact, you are likely to race through the already brief game because the lure of advancing the storyline by proceeding directly to the next key objective is difficult to resist. Set directly in the city of Krondor and its nearby surroundings, Return to Krondor's main plot involves retrieving an immensely powerful artifact, the Tear of the Gods, after it was relegated to a watery grave by an ambitious pirate, Bear. Bear has been carving a grisly path of destruction throughout the world of Midkemia as he has sought to capture the power of the Tear of the Gods to achieve his nefarious ends. To hastily save the day, a not-so-unlikely band of heroes is formed, consisting of a reformed master thief, an exotic court mage, a vengeful member of the city guard, a priest hailing from the temple that previously maintained the lost artifact, and finally, a reluctant guildsman who has been known to hurl a spell or two upon occasion. While Betrayal at Krondor was primarily a first-person-perspective game, Return to Krondor opts for a stylish, but occasionally disorienting, variety of third-person perspectives. Unlike the suddenly abundant third-person-perspective games using a "trailing camera," in Return to Krondor the camera angles are stationary in each scene, although you can choose from a variety of camera views in most key encounter areas in the game. As you move your party through the gaming world, using either directional keys or by simply mouse-clicking on a targeted location, you prompt automatic shifts in the game's camera perspective. The frequently shifting camera perspectives is often disorienting, since clicking on a location at the top of your screen regularly results in your characters actually moving towards the bottom of the screen after an involuntary camera switch. In the vast majority of outdoor locations, you can't readily switch back to a previous perspective, making it easy to initially lose orientation as you suddenly view the gaming world from a different angle. The differences between the Direct3D version of the game and the proprietary "True 3D" software version are minor, which is a compliment to the software version rather than a critique of the hardware-accelerated version. The lush background scenery in the game is often truly beautiful, and the characters are rendered in great detail, with distinctive faces (complete with lip-synching mouths) and appearances that change to reflect their equipped armor and weaponry. Scripted cutscenes are plentiful and do an excellent job of keeping you immersed in the gaming world while advancing the plot and further developing the personalities of characters in the game. Combat in the game is turn-based although not as tactical as typical turn-based role-playing games because you have fewer options available to your characters. Combat is always to the death (apparently there's no such thing as a well-advised retreat among the bloodthirsty Krondorians) and, with some notable exceptions, usually occurs in a relatively confined area. There are six schools of magic (four for mages, two for priests), and spells cast during combat exhibit suitably colorful and otherwise impressive effects. Mage spells can either be "quick cast" immediately, which could result in a spell failure, or "slow cast" over two turns, in which case the spell will be lost if the caster is hit prior to launching the spell. Priest spells are always successfully invoked and can be cast using spell points or, for the masochist in you, the life points of the caster. Unlike Betrayal at Krondor, combat does not occur on a separate "grid-like" combat screen. There is always a color-coded circle beneath the active character or enemy in combat, allowing you to instantly determine the relative health and spell points of that character or enemy. Unfortunately, while the lack of a clearly marked movement "grid" makes the environment more immersive, it also makes it difficult to quickly determine a character's movement range. Both of the previous Betrayal games featured complicated methods of opening treasure chests found during the course of the game. But instead of punishing gamers with the notoriously tedious "bead" puzzles of Betrayal in Antara or the riddle puzzles in Betrayal at Krondor, this time the treasure chests actually add to gameplay, rather than distract from it. A thief's task of unlocking and disarming a chest is graphically represented in Return to Krondor, albeit in a somewhat abstract manner. Gamers still not wanting to mess around with the puzzle chest can elect to have the game automatically determine whether or not the thievish Squire James is successful at opening a chest based solely upon his lock-picking and disarming skills. You'll gather hoards of treasure from defeated foes during the course of the game and unfortunately also spend a significant amount of time tediously identifying or moving that treasure from corpses to your characters' backpacks. Each individual item in the game has to be specifically assessed and moved, and your victims' bodies have to exasperatingly be searched one by one. The game's main problem, however, is clearly its brevity. Although there are a few difficulty settings and the option to make mages more or less effective at spell-casting, these alternatives are unlikely to significantly prolong the game's replayability. Return to Krondor is certainly not a massive and open-ended role-playing game set in an expansive gaming world. With its distinctive, preset characters, scripted events, and limited geographical scope, Return to Krondor is a more linear, story-driven, and somewhat more intimate game. While Return to Krondor may not be an epic sequel to Betrayal at Krondor, its excellent graphics and immersive plot and gaming world make it an enjoyable story-driven game while it lasts. --Desslock --Copyright ©1998 GameSpot Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of GameSpot is prohibited. -- GameSpot Review
E**Z
Excellent RPG!
This game(Return to Krondor) is far better than its predecessor, Betrayal at Krondor. The storyline is better and so are the graphics. I recommend this game for those who liked Betrayal!
M**N
Oldie but Goodie
I bought this because the original, freeware, "Betrayal at Krondor" will not work on Vista (which I cannot recommend).This sequel is a bit different than the original, but I like the gameplay and graphics. Although not as addictive as the original, I have played it again and again and each time it is different. That's a good thing.
T**N
Love this game
This game is a classic. I love the storyline and the spells, weapons, items, etc. Very creative. A lot of work went into this at the time.Cons-Very buggyThe camera controls are just plain awfulThe game freezes a lot
B**W
a classic
its based on a great book series and is the sequel to a hugely successful and revolutionary game from early game history. it is well worth getting if you have a computer that can run it.
A**E
Technology Blues
I'm a Feist fan and it seemed like a great idea. However, with Windows XP the game wouldn't install correctly the first time and now Windows cant even run the Windows 95 or earlier start program. I thought it would be fun to play an older game, well so much for that.
A**H
Anticlimactic.
This has to be the most horribly produced game from Sierra I've ever played. The storyboard artists and creators must have been off their rocker. The graphics were pretty, the battles were somewhat exciting, but the delivery fell completely short. The combat and stats were horribly unbalanced, to the point where when I played the game the first time, I found it extremely difficult, and the second time I played it, it was a breeze just because I spent time levelling my characters up. The voice acting was mediocre. The story sounds promising in the beginning, especially with this series' reputation, but it finds itself to be completely anticlimactic in the end. So if you like pretty graphics and good music only in a game, pick this one up perhaps. But I'd rather just throw Lord of the Rings in my DVD player, because this is a sore excuse for a game or a story.
J**H
Thick on Graphics, Thin on Plot
I was expecting a lot more from Return to Krondor when I bought it. While the graphics and sound effects are excellent, I was disappointed with the short running time of the game. When I opened the CD case and saw that it was a 2 CD game, I thought, "Wow! This is going to take me forever to beat! Great!" Unfortunately, it did not. All the space, it seems, is taken up by the graphics, and the plot got left out. There are only 4 characters you get to play with, and maybe 2 or 3 towns you get to explore. I remember 2 side quests, but there may have been another one I'm forgetting about.While the concept of the mage and/or the healer making their own potions is interesting, the player ends up wasting a lot of time fooling with the equipment, trying to find ingredients for the potions, and waiting . . . and waiting . . . and waiting for them to brew.Betrayal at Krondor, its predecessor, while pretty weak graphically (but consider when it was made) had and EXCELLENT plot, with many side quests, multiple characters to play with, many game characters to interact with, and a lot of locations to visit.If you're simply looking to sit in front of the PC for hours on end looking at the pretty colors on the screen, this is the game to get. If you'd like a game that is engrossing that you'll be fighting family members to get on the computer to play, I recommend getting its granddad, Betrayal at Krondor.
A**R
You need to play it more than once to appreciate it
I played the game three times and only on the third time found it in me to deviate from the path the plot was forcing on me and explore around a bit. The reward was unexpected: the game has a lot more plot than originally appears, you just need to poke around Krondor a little bit in the first three chapters. Although mildly frustrating, I found it also somehow appealing that all the little sub-plots were so deeply hidden that you had to really abandon the compelling main storyline and search around. The game is by itself one big puzzle. That's what I liked about it, and that's what I think many people don't know. My advice: for maximum enjoyment, don't race to finish the game. The first time I played it, I was done in four days (playing two or three hours a day). The third time around, it took me two weeks (playing up to four hours a day). It's worth it.
Trustpilot
1 month ago
2 weeks ago