220 x 160 IR Resolution HTI Thermal Imager, Handheld 35200 Pixels Thermal Imaging Camera with 3.2" Color Display Screen(Battery Included)

La relación costo beneficio de este producto es excelente

Ich habe mir die Wärmebildkamera gekauft um die Heiz/Kühlleitungen meiner Deckenheizung zu finden.Einerseits für die Auswahl von Deckenlampen sowie für deren Montage.Hat wunderbar funktioniert. Besser knapp 400 Euro hierfür ausgeben als die Reparaturkosten für missglückten Bohrungen.Verglichen mit teureren Geräten hat diese Kamera eine geringere Auflösung. Für Anwendungen im privaten Gebrauch reicht sie allemal.Würde sie wieder kaufen.

We buy this thermal camera to test our carbon fiber heating cable on the production line. So far, we are very satisfied with the simple operation and the thermal measurement capability. We can take pictures to document production problems.

Take a look at the pictures. Flir does connect real image to thermal image and it does if fact seem to produce nice images… until both images don’t align properly. I used the calibration option, but if I changed angle, image was not aligned again. Flir Pro has two temperature range settings, higher range was used only for the fireplace.In terms of image quality – HT-18 has highest thermal resolution sensor (220x160), then Flir Pro (160x120), and lastly Flir One (80x60). The way Flir fools you is that it takes photo in 1440x1080 resolution and then overlays the thermal image over it. HT-18 saves 240x320 pixel images so I needed to enlarge them for the comparison. I really like extra “heat” details that HT captures, as Flir seems to blur images too much (due to lower resolution thermal sensors), but HT-18 has smaller field of vision.In terms of accuracy – it’s hard to tell since I have those three devices and IR thermometer. For the comparison of 3d printer bed – printer was set up to heat to 80C. Seems like HT aligns with whatever IR thermometer is telling better than Flirs.Couple points:Flir – little space, photos directly on the phone so easy to share, need to be charged separately from the phone, One is software limited to one measurement spot, Flir watermark on all photos.HT-18 – higher refresh rate and less “calibrating” pauses, feels more secure in hand and less like a toy, 18650 battery meaning it can be more or less easy replaced, my PC refuses to connect to HT-18 if connected to USB 3 ports, USB 2 works fine, my laptop doesn’t care, my phone with usb-c to USB 3 adapter works fine.If your budget is <$200 you can’t go wrong with Flir One, but if it’s <$500 then HT-18 seems to win. Overall, I will keep HT-18 and hopefully it will last me a long time.

Destacaría la facilidad de uso , muy intuitivo.Es fácil de manejar y pesa poco.La resolución es bastante buena, quizá menos sensible que uno de uso profesional pero te resultará perfectamente útil si quieres ver tuberías de agua caliente por ejemplo.La veo muy práctica y el precio es muy competitivo. La recomiendo totalmente.