LG27GP950-B 27” Ultragear UHD (3840 x 2160) Nano IPS Gaming Monitor w/1ms Response Time, 144Hz Refresh Rate, NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible & AMD FreeSync Pro, DCI-P3 98% VD HDR 600, Black

Really good monitor

I've been using this for a few months now and the monitor is fine, not the greatest but it's okay, only problem I see with it besides sunlight not allowing you to see the monitor clearly, (regular light in the house is fine) The only problem is once in awhile you have to turn off the monitor and turn it back on because they'll be a weird cut in the middle of the screen that makes you think your screen's screwed but once you restart the monitor everything goes away, this doesn't happen often I believe it only happened to me five or seven times throughout the 6 months of owning it, I believe this problem occurs when You're changing the resolution of your screen on the computer for a game and it glitches out for a second but I'm not too certain

I got this monitor, because I wanted something to use for work and some occasional gaming. I have a 2018 Intel MacBook Pro and a 2019 HP Omen (i7-8750H, RTX 2060 6GB).The LG 27GP95R works great using a USB-C to DisplayPort 1.4 cable connected to the MacBook Pro, which supports running at 4K@95Hz through a Razer Chroma dock. macOS is able to scale everything to "look like 1440p", but with the additional sharpness of 4K. Colors look good and text is sharp.My gaming laptop has a USB-C port that supports DisplayPort, so I can use the same cable to run at 4K 144hz. It's a slightly older computer though, so I have to run games at 1080p, but they still look great. 1080p scales evenly into 4K, so I find that the graphics still look good.Since the 27GP95R is a regular LCD panel, colors aren't going to be nearly as vibrant as OLED or miniLED monitors, but everything still looks much nicer and crisper when compared to a generic office monitor. The viewing angles are good, text looks sharp, and the high refresh rate is amazing for gaming.

I was hoping to replace my iMac 2019 with a newer Mac Mini and chose this monitor as a display.All the descriptions and specifications on various sites said that this is one of the best monitors and alternatives to the Apple Studio Display. As it turned out, it is a low-quality alternative with weak backlight brightness and low 4k. After the iMac 2019 Retina, this monitor turned out to be not what most reviews on the sites wrote. I saw this immediately when I turned on this monitor.I asked the seller on Amazon to return the monitor because it did not suit me. I received a code to return the display, but when it arrived at the post office they said that I had to pay a return fee of $ 63I refused and wrote to the seller about this problem. The seller sent me another postal marker with free shipping.5 days after the return I received a refund but they took a payment of 20% of the cost of the goods ($ 88).When I bought this, it was not indicated anywhere on the Amazon website. So I am very upset that I was deceived and was not given the right to a full refund. I think this is unfair and I will write to Amazon support so that they can help me with this issue.

So I want to start with my rating... I bought a used LIKE NEW monitor from the Amazon warehouse, and received a horribly packaged product that wasn't even the correct model number. I got the GN instead of the GP lul.Despite my lower rating, the picture quality of this monitor is phenomenal. I've always only used 1440p and 1080p displays, but after using a 4k tv I've noticed how games of today just don't look good below 4k. Games today use very dull/blurry anti aliasing methods that completely ruin the clarity that 1440p used to give and now 4k is needed to get the intended visuals for the game. So 4k is great, but how is the brightness, color, response times ect. The monitor is SDR is more then bright enough for everything I played. lights, explosion and the real scene contrast is great and you won't feel wanting, I think. The monitor can not produce good blacks and generally anything with black bars will be kinda distracting, but as long as the whole screen is being filled, you wone have a problem with the contrast. Using the monitor in its default gamer 1 preset, the color was PERFECT, not one adjustment was needed, no color push, whites looked white, and colors weren't dull or over saturated. The refresh rate paired with the fast mode response time gave me a very fluid and clear experience. I come from higher refresh rate panels, so I would like 240hz, but this is 4k and 160 is much more realistic to reach in competitive games. I didn't notice any bad overshoot and in motion, ghosting is almost not perceivable.As a more competitive gamer, it was hard to convince myself to try this monitor... but after seeing the clarity that I've been missing for so many years, I don't think I can go back. Can't wait to buy a new Gpu every year 😅

Picked a couple of these up on sale to replace an old ultrawide set of monitors that started to die.The picture quality/performance on these is impressive, easily worth the price.The software that comes with the monitors is...less so. For example, you can control the LED lighting on your monitors using the software...ONE of the monitors at least. The software currently doesn't support control of more than one monitor, and in fact will *disable* control of the lighting if you have more than one monitor plugged in.You can find a third-party software that lets you control the lights on both monitors, but you shouldn't need to. May not sound like a huge issue, but if you're dropping this much cash on something you expect the software that comes with it to...well, work.

I use it for work and at night to play. Like the KVM switch to change between my work laptop and my gaming computer. Also quick switch to change fps or work mode which change the brightness and frame per second. I can play 144hz in 4k in Siege with dlss and quality is good.