Set in the glamour of the 1950's post-war London, renowned dressmaker Reynolds Woodcock (Daniel Day-Lewis) and his sister Cyril (Lesley Manville) are at the center of the British fashion, dressing royalty, movie stars, heiresses, socialites, debutants and dames with the distinct style of The House of Woodcock. Women come and go through Woodcock's life until he comes across a young, strong-willed woman, Alma (Vicky Krieps), who soon becomes a fixture in his life as his muse and lover. Once controlled and planned, he finds his carefully tailored life disrupted by the scariest curse of all…love. And so begins a Gothic Romance of twists, turns and power struggles of "pure, delicious pleasure"* that is "devilishly funny and luxuriantly sensuous."** * Peter Bradshaw, THE GUARDIAN ** Dana Stevens, SLATE
S**T
Every Man Needs A Combative Caring Muse & Every Muse Loves A Worthy Challenger
Ideally this is the kind of art film that merits whole articles more than review space on Amazon. But I'll spare you that. Instead I'll give you the mindset toolkit because it requires some 5-D glasses of sorts to enjoy in the way the filmmakers probably intended. It is a movie about layers and literal clothing layers. You can or could watch this movie for itself on one plain and take certain pleasure it's obvious esthetic which is masterful. But you may end up judging it shallow or vain or cliche. Which it absolutely is. At that level. I mean at this point culturally, we've all seen the movies about decadent fashion or fashion designers and this Oedipal character type played by Lewis is p-a-i-nfully tormentive to study even while sublimely acted to the point of being art happening within the art. And for itself, the film is an interesting kind of imaginary peek into elite fashion houses as they probably live and function and less their craftmaking, little about them seems enviable. But if you're paying attention to the layers that are quietly being screamed at you visually to notice, the real story is an allegory about men and women, courting, love, and all of the nuances about bonding. The whole dance. Chaos for order. Everything in the film is a symbol for something universal about these subjects. But the filmmakers hide them inside of a fairly straight forward story about an elite, genius fashion designer with mommy issues trying to make every woman fit his mother's metaphorical wedding dress. Which is how the story is brilliant in a basic way. You CAN watch it for its face value as a tale, and of course are meant to, but watching it for that level alone will frustrate you and will make you angry and upset. The film only grows more disturbing in fact at that level. I admit that at times I was ready to write it off and questioned Lewis' choice of this role. But then had the "A-HA" moment and saw what the storytellers were sewing. Once understanding the tempo, I began to enjoy it more and even see the characters in an adjusted and possibly deserving empathetic light. Before Lewis's character in particular was just awful and detestable and truth-be-told, not all of that gets sorted out to my liking but not sure the film needed to. Strangely, our love birds get sorted out in their own bizarre way and trust me, that's no spoiler alert. You'd have to be pretty good to really see the ending coming. I did and I didn't, but was pleased with the filmmakers special twist. Had they taken the story stitching an obvious direction, I believe it would've been declared contrived and one for the dustbins. But that's for an article or a film class which confessedly the film made me squirm to be in one where this movie could be dissected for all of its worthiness of critique and debate. I intend to watch it again and again to see the other secrets in the fabric. Oh, and you'll fall in love with actress Vickey Krieps. She's the Yin to Lewis' Yang both as an actor and a character in the film and particularly enjoyed that in such a couture design of a film, they slipped in some barely detectable improvisational moments. They were perfectly imperfect and I loved them!
D**V
Yup yup!!
Ordered after it was ripped from Netflix streaming, favorite movie ever. “Kiss me, my girl, before I’m sick.” 🤌🏽
C**W
A movie for thinking adults.
How do you know you've seen a good movie. Well I think one clear indication is that you and your significant other spend the next two days discussing and dissecting it. This movie is beautifully acted and filmed. There is so much going on here that you may want to watch it several times. I'm not going to give away the plot so no discussion of that. Daniel Day Lewis gives an amazing performance - tightly wound and somewhere just on the border between madness and genius. The plot has numerous twists. The supporting actors are amazing. Note that this is definitely not a feel good movie, but it will leave you with lots to think about and discuss. Nothing gross, no explosions, just a deep thoughtful movie that captures the mood of the late 50's/early 60's and haute couture at the time.
N**T
Movie
Excellent movie. Very good acting with interesting characters. A lovely study in personality traits. 3.75 Stars.
M**S
Fantastic watch
It's a wonderful movie with stellar performances all around. Recommend.
H**R
The director made a tactical error
I am presuming you know something about the movie. I am not going to re-tell the story to make my points. I am too dammed old and don't like typing!The acting was superb and the cinematography was good as well, except for the camera glued to the back of a car used several times, which I found out of place and a distraction. That said, the decision to have the girlfriend poison Daniel, made ZERO sense - completely stupid in my view. There was no reasonable expectation the poison mushrooms would have the effect they did, therefore - why??A MUCH better approach would have been for Daniel to have been accidentally poisoned by mushrooms which had been set aside because they were known to be so, then, by accident they became part of his meal, too late to correct. Then the girlfriend could have 'LEARNED' of the positive effect the poisoning could have on their relationship. After which, the second poisoning would have made perfect sense.As the movie is, there are HUGE gaps in the logic! (in my opinion)
L**C
A MUST HAVE!
A MUST HAVE!
C**N
Classic Period-Designed Masterpiece for The Film Enthusiast
Daniel Day Lewis apparently stated that this will be his last film, which is good for him, but he will be sorely missed. I first realized his acting genius in "The Gangs of New York" and the gritty "There Will Be Blood" and he shines in this artistic, yet engaging and visually stunning film. The title may throw some viewers off, especially younger audiences or those who need base-level violent or crude films. This is not a horror movie, in spite of the title "Phantom Thread". In this film, an aging, yet inspired and creative dress designer in 1950s England meets a woman of a lower class, who is well-educated, beautiful and refined in spite of her low rung in the social ladder. The designer is cerebral, tempermental and an effete snob, but his dresses are the rage of high society and royalty alike. The film is a close character study about how opposites attract and the pitfalls of such a relationship. The film is not an action piece by any means, but for the film connoiseur, it is a real treat. There is some Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and some undercurrents of class prejudices that don't end very well, but more than that, the film shows that there is clearly a partner for just about everyone. Ignore most of the negative reviews, since most of them were left by plebeians and youngsters. This film is not for children, unless they have a high IQ or enjoy cerebral films.
Trustpilot
1 month ago
3 weeks ago